<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: douamiinoua</title>
	<atom:link href="http://engambament.ro/blogtrei/2009/01/08/douamiinoua/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://engambament.ro/blogtrei/2009/01/08/douamiinoua/</link>
	<description>free thinkers are dangerous</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 19:23:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<meta name="generator" content="deStyle 0.9.2" />
	<item>
		<title>By: engambament</title>
		<link>http://engambament.ro/blogtrei/2009/01/08/douamiinoua/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator>engambament</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 10:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engambament.ro/blogtrei/?p=705#comment-1482</guid>
		<description>:) mda, ar fi o chestie sa si reusesc sa scriu mai des. oricum imi doresc sa am ce spune, si daca si reusesc sa transmit mai departe, cu atit mai bine. 


(la lectia mea de management ii zicea &#039;reliable&#039;. dar nici &#039;results oriented&#039; nu-i de aruncat. am asa o vaga senzatie ca &#039;obiectiv orientat catre rezultate&#039; suna aiurea, dar important e sa se inteleaga domnule esenta ;) oricum constat ca si la &lt;strong&gt;S&lt;/strong&gt; avem diferente, insa aici chiar inclin sa-ti dau dreptate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://engambament.ro/blogtrei/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  mda, ar fi o chestie sa si reusesc sa scriu mai des. oricum imi doresc sa am ce spune, si daca si reusesc sa transmit mai departe, cu atit mai bine. </p>
<p>(la lectia mea de management ii zicea &#8216;reliable&#8217;. dar nici &#8216;results oriented&#8217; nu-i de aruncat. am asa o vaga senzatie ca &#8216;obiectiv orientat catre rezultate&#8217; suna aiurea, dar important e sa se inteleaga domnule esenta <img src='http://engambament.ro/blogtrei/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  oricum constat ca si la <strong>S</strong> avem diferente, insa aici chiar inclin sa-ti dau dreptate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eduard</title>
		<link>http://engambament.ro/blogtrei/2009/01/08/douamiinoua/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>Eduard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engambament.ro/blogtrei/?p=705#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>Inteleg ca-ti pui ca obiectiv pe 2009 sa scrii mai des? :-) (btw, mi se pare ca &quot;R&quot; vine de la &quot;Results oriented&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inteleg ca-ti pui ca obiectiv pe 2009 sa scrii mai des? <img src='http://engambament.ro/blogtrei/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  (btw, mi se pare ca &#8220;R&#8221; vine de la &#8220;Results oriented&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

